The Journal of Commonwealth Literature

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blumenthal, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, Vol. 43, No. 2, 85-95 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0021989408091233

Claire Harris's "Where the Sky Is a Pitiful Tent": How Two Women Respond after Witnessing Political Torture

Anna S. Blumenthal

Morehouse College, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

In her long poem "Where the Sky Is a Pitiful Tent", Claire Harris juxtaposes quoted prose passages from I, Rigoberta Menchu to an imagined account, in poetry, of a woman's loss by murder of her rebel husband. Although Harris's topic in "Sky" is a dominant group's use of torture to control a resistant victimized group, the poet is primarily interested in the effects of such brutality on the rhetorical choices made by the two victimized women speakers, each of whom is recovering her voice in the aftermath of traumatic experience. In her two speakers Harris dramatizes the contrasting ways of knowing and speaking that Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger and Tarule in Women's Ways of Knowing identify as "separate knowing" and "connected knowing". They define the first of these approaches as "detached," "public" and "disinterested", the second as personal, "empathic", "imaginative" and emotionally aware; both perceptual methods correspond to contrasting rhetorical purposes and methods. Harris shows that though each speaker recovers an authoritative voice, each voice reveals both surprising strengths and rhetorical effectiveness as well as a tendency for omissions and distortions resulting from self-protective instincts and from the limitations intrinsic to particular genres. Irony and paradox abound, as Harris dramatizes her two speakers' isolation as well as their mutual dependence: full awareness requires rhetorical and generic inclusiveness.

Key Words: Rigoberta Menchu • Claire Harris • Women's Ways of Knowing • "Where the Sky Is a Pitiful Tent" • power • rhetoric • trauma • torture • "separate knowing" • "connected knowing"


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?