Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Commonwealth Literature
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, C.-y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Betrayal of Form: The "Teeming" Narrative and the Allegorical Impulse in Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children

Chun-yen Chen

National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan

There has been a tendency among postcolonial critics to naturalize the proximity of the postcolonial literary imagination and allegory, with Rushdie’s work and even his career being seen as prominent instances of this proximity. Most such readings view allegory as a straightforward mode of literary expression in which the "message" of the allegorical sign is granted singular importance, while its formal features often go unheeded. Coterminous with such a conception of allegory is the assumption that it is supposed to function at a "critical distance" from the subject-matter in question. This article argues that Rushdie’s allegorical practice works differently. Drawing on Walter Benjamin’s theory of allegory, I read the allegorical images in Midnight’s Children as emblematic of a particular symptom of postcoloniality, the impossibility of the postcolonial subject’s breaking free from the colonial legacy, on the one hand, and from the hegemonic nationalist discourse of the postcolonial condition, on the other. Yet it is precisely when the postcolonial subject is overpowered by the hegemonic discourse’s demands that s/he makes sense of the historical condition that the nonsensicality of the hegemony is exposed. I also suggest that a Benjaminian reading helps put in perspective those discussions of Rushdie’s position, which suggest his putative "complicity" with hegemony.

Key Words: Salman Rushdie • Walter Benjamin • postcoloniality • allegory • overdetermination • Midnight’s Children

The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, Vol. 44, No. 3, 143-161 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0021989409342161


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?